[DUG] Related try..finally question

[James Sugrue]

Actually, it's the converse of that. Most applications it wouldn't matter.
Ones like yours are the exception rather than the rule.

-----Original Message-----
From: delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz [mailto:delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz] On
Behalf Of Phil Scadden
Sent: Wednesday, 26 July 2006 10:08 a.m.
To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List
Subject: RE: [DUG] Related try..finally question

> You say your way improves time and performance. Are you programming 
> for a Commodore 64? I wouldn't have though on modern machines it would 
> be an issue?

This is a narrow view of application range. For what I do, no computer is
fast enough and surprise, java and C# don't figure. Delphi only just fits my
performance/convenience trade off and only sometimes. Otherwise its C. If
there is time cost to convenience then I want option of switching it off.

----------------------------------------------------------
Phil Scadden, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences
764 Cumberland St, Private Bag 1930, Dunedin, New Zealand Ph +64 3 4799663,
fax +64 3 477 5232

_______________________________________________
Delphi mailing list
Delphi at ns3.123.co.nz
http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi