<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">It seems to me that BECP needs a better QC process, perhaps by asking<br>
the community to help test new releases by offering time limited beta<br>
releases for free and discounts on the final releases for people who<br>
report bugs?? I guess the fact that ownership changes hands often<br>
doesn't help either.<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>They know a lot of the bugs are there. It ultimately boils down to a resource and perceived priority issue.</div><div><br></div><div>They run field tests/beta tests and people on subscription now get access to them to raise bugs if they want. At the end of the day, it is a high cost product, it shouldn't need the community to prop it up with sales and also bug fixes. Sure we've all put bugs into our software, but it is more the time it takes to get a fix out to the public. Visual Studio (IDE) and Xamarin (Lib) have releases almost weekly. </div><div><br></div><div>Why does it take EMBT so long to release a fix pack and why after all this time can't they figure out how to release patches instead of full installs.</div><div> </div></div></div></div>