<div><br>"Perhaps they asked MS to deliberately break old versions so that would<br>happen... Start the conspiracy theories now..."</div>
<div> </div>
<div>USA senate hearings were open enough in these dorts of points, but no where have I even hinted at such a thing.<br> </div>
<div>I'm sorry you're going in that direction I'll retire from this now as it is getting out of hand.<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">On 18/11/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jeremy North</b> <<a href="mailto:jeremy.north@gmail.com">jeremy.north@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">You honestly think Borland should fix an old product that was never<br>certified to run on a new operating system?
<br><br>MS has fixed issues with BDE compatibility and Debugger issue with<br>previous versions of products and don't expect it to be any<br>differently.<br><br>Wanting Borland to send out a fix for an old product version on a beta
<br>operating system doesn't sound like good business sense to me.<br><br>> possibly its<br>> in Borlands interest to leave them as it will force people to buy the new<br>> IDE<br><br>Perhaps they asked MS to deliberately break old versions so that would
<br>happen... Start the conspiracy theories now...<br><br>On 11/18/05, Paul A Norman <<a href="mailto:paul.a.norman@gmail.com">paul.a.norman@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Apparently there are issues from August still outstanding and possibly its
<br>> in Borlands interest to leave them as it will force people to buy the new<br>> IDE<br><br>_______________________________________________<br>Delphi mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Delphi@ns3.123.co.nz">Delphi@ns3.123.co.nz
</a><br><a href="http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi">http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi</a><br></blockquote></div><br>