[DUG] Can anyone explain this one?

[Jeremy Coulter]

Yip, its definitly there. I build the XML up, and I am checking it before
it leaves so I know that at the point of calling the "Post" its definitly
there.
the one thing I havent done is run up wireshark.....this will tell me if
its leaving my machine in tact I guess.

Jeremy

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Jolyon Smith <jsmith at deltics.co.nz> wrote:

> If adding an "extra" prolog fixes it then I would ask if the prolog is
> really there in the original xml to start with ?
>
> Some XML viewers will add a default prolog when viewing xml that doesn't
> contain any prolog.  When viewing this xml in IE for example:
>
> <root>
>   <child />
> </root>
>
> What IE actually shows is:
>
> <?xml version="1.0"?>
> -<root>
>     <child/>
>  </root>
>
> I am sure I have seen similar behaviour in other xml viewers.  I find this
> an increasingly prevalent problem, with computer software trying to be too
> "helpful"; especially irksome in data viewers that introduce artefacts in
> the data being viewed that aren't actually present.
>
> _______________________________________________
> NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list
> Post: delphi at listserver.123.net.nz
> Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
> Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-request at listserver.123.net.nz with
> Subject: unsubscribe
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.123.net.nz/pipermail/delphi/attachments/20121005/1c649b5b/attachment.html