[DUG] Indy and Delphi 2010 - supplemental

[Conor Boyd]

Wasn't at the launch(es), so no idea what went on, but I'd like to say
that I welcome all your input here; your contributions (both here and on
your blog) invariably seem helpful, lengthy and considered.
 
I would like to make a respectful comment in Richard's direction that if
his posts to this list weren't often so brief/single sentence and often
only appearing when there is a Developers-Inc event/campaign upcoming,
they might run less risk of getting misinterpreted as they seem to do at
times.
 
Kind regards,
 
Conor

________________________________

From: delphi-bounces at delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-bounces at delphi.org.nz]
On Behalf Of Jolyon Smith
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2009 3:50 p.m.
To: 'NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List'
Subject: Re: [DUG] Indy and Delphi 2010 - supplemental



No I was not "a problem" at the Delphi launch.  One pointed and tongue
in cheek observation w.r.t the fact that the Project Options dialog does
not itself make use of the much vaunted checkbox property editor for
boolean's does not amount to "a problem" in my book.

 

No, Richard for some reason chose to single me out as unfriendly and
unhelpful specifically w.r.t my contribution to this list.

 

It is fair to say that I have taken deep, DEEP offence at that, being
among what I consider to be among the most strenuously helpful and
polite (not to mention trying to straighten out misunderstandings
between others who perhaps have not been so helpful or friendly - not
naming names, but shall we just say that those choosing to reside in
glass houses should not be so quick to throw stones).

 

Suffice to say that any further software purchases that I personally
make shall not contribute to any swelling of Developers-Inc coffers.  I
see no need to be helpful in THAT direction at all.

 

It didn't help - although not directly connected - that presumably for
some other reason Malcolm Groves neglected to mention that it was my
comment on his blog that prompted him to have the conversation with
Chris Bensen (to whom I'd already put the idea, via his blog) about
directly supporting for Synaptics devices in the touch/gesturing engine
in Delphi, preferring instead to give the impression that this was his -
or Chris' - idea.

 

 

From: delphi-bounces at delphi.org.nz [mailto:delphi-bounces at delphi.org.nz]
On Behalf Of Robert martin
Sent: Tuesday, 13 October 2009 3:11 p.m.
To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List
Subject: Re: [DUG] Indy and Delphi 2010 - supplemental

 

Your best option is to join the Indy list group and post there.  Remy (i
think) is pretty active.  I have not seen any posts about this problem
so i think its likely something with your setup.

Rob

p.s. I take it you were a 'problem' at the Auckland Delphi launch?  





 

 

 



Jolyon Smith wrote: 

Having switched back to compiling against the version of Indy supplied
with Delphi 2010 itself, this too does not build!!

 

The IdCodeHeader unit references IdHeaderCoderBase unit... this does not
exist in the Indy files supplied with Delphi (but *IS* present in the
latest IndyTiburon.zip.... which I can't use for the reason in the
previous post).

 

HELP!?  Am I just doing something dumb?


>From your local, "unfriendly", "unhelpful" Delphi Advocate,

Jolyon

 

________________________________



 
_______________________________________________
NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi mailing list
Post: delphi at delphi.org.nz
Admin: http://delphi.org.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
Unsubscribe: send an email to delphi-request at delphi.org.nz with Subject:
unsubscribe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listserver.123.net.nz/pipermail/delphi/attachments/20091013/709f3482/attachment-0001.html