[DUG] Scripting languages

[peter at webcentre.co.nz]

> A small software house will consider a good design a compact tight
> design that prohibits bugs, and makes good software, even though the
> learning curve is huge.

Yes, though I'm not all that happy with big learning curves.

And "Makes good software" is a rather important criterion. There's no
end of crap that can be churned out in the name of good design, with
tools tailored for that objective. Why is why I become amused when I
hear people praising Bold, for example. Beautiful designs. Useless
performance in real-life applications.

So please don't mention Bold too often if you want to lure me towards
ECO, Richard <G>.

cheers,
peter