[DUG] Related try..finally question
Conor Boyd
Conor.Boyd at trimble.co.nz
Fri Jul 21 14:53:12 NZST 2006
But all your object creation shouldn't really be inside the try's for a
start.
When you call a constructor, and there's an exception inside the
constructor, you're guaranteed that Delphi will tidy up the partially
created instance.
It gets a bit verbose, but IMHO the correct form is as follows:
Something := TSomething.Create(nil);
Try
X := TX.Create(blah); //for some reason crashes here
Try
Y := TY.Create();
Try
//Do Something
Finally
FreeAndNil(y); //will throw exception (?) because was
never created
End;
Finally
FreeAndNil(X);
End;
finally
FreeAndNil(Something);
End;
Don't get me wrong, I don't often go too far down this route, preferring
instead to refactor into smaller methods for a start.
Dennis' is an interesting suggestion, tho'. I will look into that.
Cheers,
C.
-----Original Message-----
From: delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz [mailto:delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz]
On Behalf Of James Sugrue
That's an interesting one. I guess you're talking about something like
this?
Try
Something := TSomething.Create(nil);
X := TX.Create(blah); //for some reason crashes here
Y := TY.Create();
Finally
FreeAndNil(Something);
FreeAndNil(X);
FreeAndNil(y); //will throw exception (?) because was never created
End;
If so then you could just
If (something <> nil) then
FreeAndNil(something);
??
(apologies for any coding errors, haven't done much Delphi recently)
More information about the Delphi
mailing list