[DUG] Delphi 2006 .Net.

[Paul A Norman]

Sounds encouraging, I've sort of been holding off like a few others,
watching all those Quality Control reports is a little bit discouraging. And
I just missed out on the reduced upgrade price last year so that dampned
things a bit as well.

> "Delphi 2006 is beautiful so far. I'm really happy with it . ."

I'll have to think about it again.

Paul


On 16/03/06, Matthew Comb <matt at ferndigital.com> wrote:
>
> Thats good news. I'm keen to give it another shot. perhaps ill have a play
> over the weekend.
>
> Matt.
>
> > Debugger is greatly improved. That's not to say it is perfect.
> > Still a bit heavy on memory usage but that depends on the size of the
> > application being debugged.
> >
> > cheers,
> > Jeremy
> >
> > On 3/16/06, Matthew Comb <matt at ferndigital.com> wrote:
> >> I bought D2005 and it never made it out of the packaging after I worked
> >> on
> >> a contract using it. Painful.
> >>
> >> Delphi 2006 is beautiful so far. I'm really happy with it, although I
> >> have
> >> not done any .Net debugging in it so far. I would really like to hear
> >> from
> >> people who are using it with .Net and how stable it is as that was
> where
> >> Delphi 2005 fell down. In particular the debuging / tracing aspect.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Delphi mailing list
> > Delphi at ns3.123.co.nz
> > http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Delphi mailing list
> Delphi at ns3.123.co.nz
> http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ns3.123.co.nz/pipermail/delphi/attachments/20060407/b755e609/attachment.html