[DUG] Delphi and next Windows OS

Paul A Norman paul.a.norman at gmail.com
Fri Nov 18 11:57:00 NZDT 2005


"Perhaps they asked MS to deliberately break old versions so that would
happen... Start the conspiracy theories now..."
 USA senate hearings were open enough in these dorts of points, but no where
have I even hinted at such a thing.
 I'm sorry you're going in that direction I'll retire from this now as it is
getting out of hand.

 On 18/11/05, Jeremy North <jeremy.north at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You honestly think Borland should fix an old product that was never
> certified to run on a new operating system?
>
> MS has fixed issues with BDE compatibility and Debugger issue with
> previous versions of products and don't expect it to be any
> differently.
>
> Wanting Borland to send out a fix for an old product version on a beta
> operating system doesn't sound like good business sense to me.
>
> > possibly its
> > in Borlands interest to leave them as it will force people to buy the
> new
> > IDE
>
> Perhaps they asked MS to deliberately break old versions so that would
> happen... Start the conspiracy theories now...
>
> On 11/18/05, Paul A Norman <paul.a.norman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Apparently there are issues from August still outstanding and possibly
> its
> > in Borlands interest to leave them as it will force people to buy the
> new
> > IDE
>
> _______________________________________________
> Delphi mailing list
> Delphi at ns3.123.co.nz
> http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://ns3.123.co.nz/pipermail/delphi/attachments/20051118/acd8bc81/attachment.html


More information about the Delphi mailing list