[DUG] Debugging on TS
Stephen Barker
Steve at webdata.co.nz
Fri Jul 29 17:57:17 NZST 2005
Maybe you could change the btnclick to not close the form but post a
wm_close message to it?
Steve
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rohit Gupta [mailto:rohit at cfl.co.nz]
> Sent: Friday, 29 July 2005 4:47 p.m.
> To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List
> Subject: RE: [DUG] Debugging on TS
>
> After removing all instances of ProcessMessages in the chain
> of execution the problem still happpens. The only common thing is
> that the last event is Buttonup.... Yes we have been here before.
>
> One of the major flaws in windoze... where the btnclick
> closes a form the btnup event can go to some other form.
>
> If I alter the form so that a click on the panel closes the
> form (just the same way the button would do) then everything
> works fine. If the button is pressed then we have this silly
> exception.
>
> I am still a bit dubious about multiple instances of
> comctl32. There are infact three copies on the TS server -
> all different.
>
> From: "Rohit Gupta" <rohit at cfl.co.nz>
> Organization: Computer Fanatics Ltd
> To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi
> List <delphi at ns3.123.co.nz>
> Date sent: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 09:34:30 +1200
> Subject: RE: [DUG] Debugging on TS
> Priority: normal
> Send reply to: rohit at cfl.co.nz,
> NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List <delphi at ns3.123.co.nz>
> <mailto:delphi-request at ns3.123.co.nz?subject=unsubscribe>
> <mailto:delphi-request at ns3.123.co.nz?subject=subscribe>
>
> [ Double-click this line for list subscription options ]
>
> Max,
>
> >From the name of function/procedure in ntdll it was obvious that it
> was context switch. But I had not suspected
> Reschedule_Thread. I will try it out shortly.... bearing in
> mind that if the problem disappears it doesnt prove anything. :-)
>
> In the meantime I have removed two threads created by the
> coloured button components that we use. It was a frivolous
> use of the thread and its gone... but the problem remains.
>
> Finally, if you look at this dump of dlls. Why is comctl32
> in twice - and two different versions ? At present I suspect
> this more. For a normal environment I would say this is a no
> no.... but TS... who knows.
>
>
> modules:
> 00400000 vetlink.exe c:\vl2\livedata
> 10000000 gds32.dll 6.3.0.4288 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 4b750000 hhctrl.ocx 5.2.3790.2427 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 5ccf0000 SAMLIB.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 5e9a0000 olepro32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 5f120000 ntlanman.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 5f270000 hnetcfg.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 5f860000 NETUI1.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 5f8a0000 NETUI0.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 71ae0000 wshtcpip.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 71b20000 mswsock.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 71b70000 uxtheme.dll 6.0.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 71bb0000 wsock32.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 71bc0000 rdpsnd.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 71bd0000 mpr.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 71bf0000 WS2HELP.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 71c00000 WS2_32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 71c20000 tsappcmp.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 71c40000 NETAPI32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 73070000 winspool.drv 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 73440000 RICHED32.DLL 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 74b40000 oledlg.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 74c40000 RICHED20.DLL 5.31.23.1224 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 75e90000 drprov.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 75ea0000 davclnt.dll 5.2.3790.0 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 76290000 imm32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 762b0000 comdlg32.dll 6.0.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 767a0000 UNIDRVUI.DLL 0.3.3790.1830
> C:\WINDOWS\system32\spool\DRIVERS\W32X86\3
> 76aa0000 winmm.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 76b70000 PSAPI.DLL 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 76ed0000 DNSAPI.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 76f00000 wtsapi32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 76f10000 WLDAP32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 76f50000 Secur32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 76f70000 winrnr.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\System32
> 76f80000 rasadhlp.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 771f0000 WINSTA.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77380000 user32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77420000 comctl32.dll 6.0.3790.1830
> C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.Common-
> Controls_6595b64144ccf1df_6.0.3790.1830_x-ww_7AE38CCF
> 77530000 comctl32.dll 5.82.3790.1830
> C:\WINDOWS\WinSxS\x86_Microsoft.Windows.Common-
> Controls_6595b64144ccf1df_5.82.3790.1830_x-ww_1B6F474A
> 77670000 ole32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77b90000 version.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77ba0000 msvcrt.dll 7.0.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77c00000 GDI32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77c50000 RPCRT4.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77d00000 oleaut32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77da0000 SHLWAPI.dll 6.0.3790.2440 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77e40000 kernel32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 77f50000 ADVAPI32.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 780c0000 MSVCP60.dll 6.5.2144.0 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 7c800000 ntdll.dll 5.2.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
> 7c8d0000 shell32.dll 6.0.3790.1830 C:\WINDOWS\system32
>
>
> From: "Max Nilson" <mnilson at xtra.co.nz>
> To: <rohit at cfl.co.nz>,
> "'NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List'"
> <delphi at ns3.123.co.nz>
> Subject: RE: [DUG] Debugging on TS
> Date sent: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 19:30:38 +1200
> Organization: Profax International Limited
> Send reply to: mnilson at xtra.co.nz
>
> Rohit asked:
>
> > Heres a dump from madshit. Any clues anyone ? It appears
> > to be inside ntdll.
>
> Looks like your code is going reentrant. Your
> Reschedule_Thread is causing it, and I'm assuming that you
> want it to do this, but it has been a persistent source of
> errors in our application for years now. Just when you damn
> well know that there can be no pending events, you find out
> that something like the mouse driver starts doing syncronous
> SendMessage calls that are getting grabbed by a nested
> ProcessMessages and all hell breaks loose.
>
> I think that you should investigate removing the reentrancy
> and seeing if TS likes this better.
>
> Good luck,
> Max.
> Regards
>
> Rohit
>
> ======================================================================
> CFL - Computer Fanatics Ltd. 21 Barry's Point Road, AKL, New Zealand
> PH (649) 489-2280
> FX (649) 489-2290
> email rohit at cfl.co.nz or r.gupta at xtra.co.nz
> ======================================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Delphi mailing list
> Delphi at ns3.123.co.nz
> http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
> Regards
>
> Rohit
>
> ======================================================================
> CFL - Computer Fanatics Ltd. 21 Barry's Point Road, AKL, New Zealand
> PH (649) 489-2280
> FX (649) 489-2290
> email rohit at cfl.co.nz or r.gupta at xtra.co.nz
> ======================================================================
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Delphi mailing list
> Delphi at ns3.123.co.nz
> http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.338 / Virus Database: 267.9.7/60 - Release Date:
> 28/07/2005
>
>
More information about the Delphi
mailing list