[DUG] Bristol Cars. A Development Model.
Kyley Harris
KyleyHarris at gmail.com
Sun Aug 21 20:06:19 NZST 2005
>The Profax/Accredo story reminds me of Bristol making cars, it was
said that they wouldn't buy in a component for 5 pounds if they could
>make it for 20.
I would say that this is actually a compliment in the best way ;) It
means that you believe your customers should not settle for second best
just because everyone elses customers have to... Good work.
>> I've seen 2 Bristols on the road in my life.
Who around here has? I don't hang out for tea and scones with the elite
and go for a sunday drive in their Bristol before hopping on the private
cruize liner home... The closest I come to is watching the apprentice
with Donald Trump. ;) The type of person who spends 200,000 on a watch
because Rolex is cliche....
If you were a car dealer/ or a software dealer would like to try and
sell 20 Suzukis to people who are scrimping for funds, or sell one
decent car to someone who has an open cheque for unique quality....? I
prefer option 2.
There are other companies around locally who have written their own
databases ( not me ) and they did it when Microsoft didn't exist and
oracle was a tiny nothing... Their customers will keep using it when
Microsoft forces another reinvention of the wheel, because it works.
Perhaps the Profax clients look at everyone elses products and go "Thank
god I'm not using that ubiquitous shit." perhaps they are even happy to
pay for a product that works instead of paying to have it get fixed all
the time.
I use delphi because I like pascal and Delphi did do a good job. I like
firebird because it is simple light and quick. It never said it was
oracle competition.. and it kicks ass over DBISAM and other small light
databases. In fact in its class as a lightweight I would say that is is
"Best of Breed" apples with apples. Perhaps that pathological M$ hatred
is bleeding into other areas and the delusion is in hating a company,
but then writing products for their OS's.
Lastly... Delphi is OO and also non-OO. its each persons choice to use 1
or both options. and as for encapsulation... Just because delphi has a
vcl, doesn't mean that its encapsulated, or even written properly, or
bug free. Being OO does not automatically define encapsulation. If
someone gives me a hammer with a split in the shaft that cant be glued
back together its not reinventing the wheel to create a hammer that is
better for that job..... Sometimes delphi gives you a sledge hammer when
what you need is a soft mallet. Thats why we are programmers and
architects. If you can't use your own creativity to decide that
something is not right then you are basically a jigsaw puzzle maker, or
a lego builder... If people didn't insist in reinventing things, we
wouldn't have decent source code, or compilers or OS's. we wouldn't
event have computers. without developers like Paul and Profax pushing
the envelope we wouldn't have linux or any of the other things like
PostgeSQL which is also just another wheel.
that would be my 3c
More information about the Delphi
mailing list