[DUG] Borland breakup demanded

[Leigh Wanstead]

Hi Richard,

>>Consider Centura/Gupta - if we
>>stayed doing what we were doing 5-6 years ago, we'd be like them.

I don't understand what you said. Can you tell me in detail? Just curious
;-)

TIA

Regards
Leigh
http://www.salenz.com

-----Original Message-----
From: delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz
[mailto:delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz]On Behalf Of Richard Vowles
Sent: Friday, 5 August 2005 5:08 p.m.
To: NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List
Subject: RE: [DUG] Borland breakup demanded


I have replied to Stefan privately as I am not allowed to speak for the
company, but I did point out one thing. Consider Centura/Gupta - if we
stayed doing what we were doing 5-6 years ago, we'd be like them.

-----Original Message-----
From: delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz [mailto:delphi-bounces at ns3.123.co.nz]
On Behalf Of Stefan Mueller
Sent: Friday, 5 August 2005 12:48 a.m.
To: 'NZ Borland Developers Group - Delphi List'
Subject: RE: [DUG] Borland breakup demanded

But Richard, seriously - it does sound a bit like they are getting no
funding at all, at least not for this year ;-/

Quote from http://biz.yahoo.com/bizj/050803/1144365.html?.v=1

"We continued to see positive signs in the ALM (Application Lifecycle
Management) segment of our business as more customers turn to Borland to
help maximize the business value of their software," commented Scott
Arnold, interim chief executive officer. "Our challenge is to accelerate
growth in our ALM business while managing our maturing products. Our
efforts for the remainder of 2005 will focus squarely on executing our
ALM growth strategy."


I am somewhat concerned about the long term of Delphi, with Borland that
determined to head off into other markets than developer IDEs and
compilers.

_______________________________________________
Delphi mailing list
Delphi at ns3.123.co.nz
http://ns3.123.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/delphi